Orson Scott Card and Homophobia

You may have seen a few articles about Orson Scott Card around the internet. The movie adaptation of his novel, Ender's Game, is due in theaters in a couple of months and groups are calling for boycotts, letters, and protests because Orson Scott Card doesn't believe in gay marriage. He not only is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ for Latter-Day Saints {notoriously part of the effort behind Proposition 8 in California and decidedly unfriendly to gay marriage} but was also on the board of the National Organization of Marriage.

As a pro-gay marriage reader, where does that leave me? Or you? Should we stop reading Card's books? Should we all discard Ender's Game, and Pathfinder, and Enchanted? Is buying his books supporting his beliefs? Is it wrong to stop financially supporting someone because of what they believe? Is it wrong not to?

I struggled with these hard questions. I'm sure the answer I've decided upon won't be popular. And yet, I believe it is fair.

It is unAmerican to stop supporting authors because of their beliefs {and to a certain extent, I believe the same of business boycotts as well}. I disagree, loudly, with Mr. Card. I cannot fathom how he believes what he does. The NOM is simply incomprehensible to me because I simply don't get how seemingly intelligent and well-adjusted people can believe the things they believe and say the things they say on a legal level. Certainly we are all entitled to our ideas of how we conduct our private lives, but I personally don't understand people who try and write that personal code into law for others.

Yet, I hold many beliefs, and I trust that the people I work for judge me based on the job I do, not on which party I generally side with, or what my thoughts are on hot-button issues. Of course, in some jobs it *does* matter. I will never get why pro-life folks want to work at Planned Parenthood. It seems counter-intuitive, right? Likewise, though I am good at being camp administrative staff and my background is summer youth programs, I would NOT apply for one at a religious Christian camp. Some jobs just don't fit your personal moral or religious code.

Mr. Card, however, is not in a positions like those. He is an author, and a very good one. I enjoy his books, and so do a lot of other people. He does his job well, and cannot be faulted for having opinions and expecting for people to judge and buy his novels based on his writing and stories. 

Think of it this way: would you consider it acceptable to interrogate a teacher on her personal beliefs if she did not share them with her students? Would you consider it acceptable to do the same to a contractor on your home or the person selling you ice cream? Probably not. If Mr. Card wrote a book about this topic, in which he explicitly shared his beliefs, I would absolutely advocate not buying that book if that is your choice. But, to do so for unrelated novels and then further a movie adaptation to those novels seems to be a far reach.

Having said this, I also think the most productive way to combat opinions you disagree with is to be an advocate. The $5 {maybe} that ends in Mr. Card's pockets is not going to limit him much if you don't watch his movie. You know what will? Showing class, rallying, and working for what you believe in with organizations who promote your cause. I, myself, am an Ally and I donate to organizations which help further equality for everyone. That goes much farther, in my opinion, than refusing to buy a novel or see a movie and then telling everyone why.

What are your thoughts? Will you see the new movie adaptation of Ender's Game? Will you boycott?

No H8

UPDATE: The Student Body President vetoed the bill as of 4/26 at approximately 3:00. It now goes back to the Senate.

Pardon me. I'm about to hijack my own blog, and get on my soap box. I'm going to be controversial, and I'm going to say things that you might disagree with. I don't usually do that; the last place I need a political/social debate is on my blog. But, sometimes, you just have to say something. And for me, it's now. I just have to say something.

I've posted before about why I love Texas A&M. I love that guys still give up their seat on the bus for me, and hold open doors. I love that people are generally friendly and look out for each other {(one time I felt sick riding my bike to campus and laid down on some grass. Within seconds someone pulled over to make sure I was OK)}. I love Silver Taps, and Muster, and Yell Practice, and The Spirit, and The War Hymn.

Yet, I'm growing weary of the rhetoric surrounding the GLBTA (Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Transgender Aggies) and the GLBT resource center. Recently, the Texas A&M Student Senate passed a resolution to support legislation that would require campuses with LGBT resource centers to also have "Traditional Family Values Centers." This was recently put into the budget bill passed by the Texas House. In addition to requiring these centers, the legislation does not allow student fees to be raised to cover it's operation; rather funds allocated for LGBT resource centers would be split.

The argument is that all students should have access to services and resources based on their own beliefs. And while I respect that being part of the LGBT community is controversial {(although I have a hard time understanding this)}, I have to wonder what the true motives of the bill are. On this campus, there are over 100 recognized religious organizations, of which roughly 90 are Christian organizations {(this doesn't count the ministries in the area which serve the college-aged population)} for students who wish to learn about "traditional family values {(and would someone please tell me what those are, anyways?)}. All are eligible to apply for various funding through the university. In contrast there is one organization for members of the LGBT community, and one resource center {(which doesn't push information on anyone, btw)}. Studies have shown that in conservative areas that LGBT youth {(which arguably can describe people up to the age of 25)} are more likely to commit suicide than their straight peers.

This is no surprise when you consider that since I've been here (August 2004) there have been numerous protests comparing LGBT individuals to animals, or refering to them as subhuman, as satanic. It is being made clear that many do not consider LGBT individuals Aggies. In a recent open letter to the student senate, one commenter says as much. This is unacceptable to me. At one point, women weren't Aggies, but here I am. At one point, minorities weren't Aggies. But they are. We are ALL Aggies. We don't have to agree, or like each other, or speak to each other. But we should treat each other with respect, and dignity. If we can't even do that, then what good is our honor code, and our claim that we're one of the "friendliest" college campuses in the nation?

The GLBT resource center offers advice, resources {(duh!)} and support to any Aggie, gay, straight, transgender, bisexual, or questioning. It is a place to go when students feel like no one wants them here, when they see protests against them, when they are discriminated against or verbally assaulted. It offers awareness programs, supports the Allies {(whoop!)}, and encourages those seeking services to participate in the A&M community and follow the traditions. Forcing the resource center to split funds with a "traditional family values center" effectively dries up funding for the GLBT resource center which those fighting for the bill have admitted is the purpose in the first place. They really don't care about a "traditional family values" center.

It's time we all respect each other and treat each other as we want to be treated. We are the Aggies, a term which does not come with qualifiers. Let's act like human beings and stop with the politics and the discrimination. Let's stop the H8.

Notes:
-The pictures are from the recent walk organized by the GLBTA and the resource center to promote equality on campus.
-I welcome rational, polite, respectful conversation on this topic. I will not allow comments which are hateful {(to anyone)}.